Moot???

[Lakota]

OK, do we want to run Moot in game this month or online? Thoughts, feelings, concerns....

[Carter Heyward]

Moots at game are better even though they are not every game. Online they feel too sterile, but do have one advantage of involving players like Mike P and Ben, if they want.

[Arianna_Fireau]

I vote moot at game.

[Owen Smith]

I like moots at game, but not too often. Maybe every third game or so. I especially like having advanced notice so I can plan a proper revel with the STs.

Hm.... revel.

[Lakota]

Thus why I am asking. I think the ruling by the STs was one in game moon a season. So we should have one this month or next.

[Justin Northwood]

Moots at game definitely add flavor, but are best when used sparingly- about one every three games or so, as suggested by Ken.  Additionally, in-between moots can be held online, for the benefit of our online players, as well as anyone else who chooses to participate.  Remember, we have moots monthly anyways, as it's part of Honeybee's ban.

[Arianna_Fireau]

Can we have a Moot this game pleeeeease.

Sides, Muintir has to throw a moot sometime soon for Spring. All hail Danu.

[Lucky Wolf]

I would vote for a moot, but we have only gone one session without one in game and I wont be able to be there for the entire session this coming month.

[Alexander Amarandus van Bokkelen]

I like moots, but suggest next game rather than this one.